Myles Power VS AIDS denialism

Among the difficulties inherent in any form of censorship — even censorship that’s valid in the first place — is function creep.
Think of a clever solution to block illegal images of child sexual abuse, and someone will want to put it to use to block piracy websites, etc. Force ISPs to install parental-control filters, and soon the infrastructure is being used to block extremist videos as well as other “harmful content”. And so on. It’s all well intentioned, but censorship with good goals can nevertheless fail.
Here’s one such example. The wonderfully called Myles Power is a science blogger from Middlesbrough. His web site features oodles of educational YouTube videos, from the best way to extract DNA from strawberries to making a fundamental jet engine in the house.
He got his beginning — or at least a bulge up the YouTube positions — after being asked by Google’s video site to become something called an “EDU master”, which basically means they flew the Brit to San Francisco to educate him how better to share his passion for science education online.
All outstanding items, and a great example of utilizing the web to educate and inspire.
Tomorrow, however, he’s at risk of getting his entire YouTube channel of science education videos yanked, carrying out a DMCA takedown request.
If you have any inquiries regarding where and the best ways to make use of house of number documentary, you can call us at our web site. The Digital Millennium Copyright Act is a US law that gives sites “safe harbour” from copyright claims if they act quickly to take down infringing content when notified by the owner. In other words, if someone posts, say, Miley Cyrus’ entire catalog of songs on YouTube, her record label can ask Google to delete the videos. As well it should (not least to stop her spread).
Due to the epic scale of handling this — a lot of folks post plenty of infringing content — much of the process has been automated. Any individual or organisation can file a claim of infringement through Google’s site for its search results or YouTube content. They’re assumed to assert only if they own the content, or are acting to the owner’s behalf, and, naturally, provided that their claim is valid. However, there’s nothing preventing someone from submitting a claim against, for example, PC Pro’s own channel, even though we weren’t infringing anything (which we aren’t, so don’t get any notions), and we’d be forced to react to avoid trouble.
And that’s what occured to Power — though he’s not just uploading pop songs. Alongside his educational work, he creates Bad Science-style videos debunking erroneous science beliefs. His most recent has focused on an AIDS-refusing documentary, which has attracted the attention of the group supporting the picture. That group has issued multiple DMCA takedown notices requesting the content be removed from YouTube — which Google has obediently done. And because he’s had so many grievances, the rest of Power’s content — unrelated to that documentary — is also in danger of being pulled.
Put simply, it’s censorship by copyright law.

Power has a recourse, apart from trusting journalists will hassle Google enough to sort this problem out. He can file a “counter-notification” via a link directly in his account — but this takes ten days to procedure. The initial claims against his account hit on 7 February, and because he’s had so many complaints (all from the same source) his account is in danger of termination on 18 February.
To pause the process, it appears he is able to file a “valid” counter-notification, and hope YouTube and Google agree with him. Power’s enthusiasts, meanwhile, have found other methods to react, notably uploading his videos to other sharing websites, to ensure they remain available regardless of YouTube’s final decision.
There’s another disadvantage to Google’s system, nonetheless. It isn’t the web giant’s fault, but as the counter-notice is a legal document, it comprises your “private info” — making it a useful means to track down personal details of your critics, should you want to harass them further (though there’s no idea that’s the motivation in Power’s case).
The basic fact remains that the educational blogger — one that is flown around the globe by YouTube itself in recognition of the value of his uploads — is being compelled to fight paperwork conflicts and PR skirmishes thanks to abuse of the DMCA, when he should be teaching children how to (safely) explode matters in the pursuit of scientific knowledge.
This isn’t the very first time this has occured, also it absolutely won’t be the last. Google has sought to draw attention to the scenario, printing every copyright notice it receives via the Chilling Effects site, but what’s actually needed is a better system for halting harassment via DMCA.
Copyright problems need dealing with, but any law that allows content to be prohibited to get a great motive might be abused to remove something for the wrong reasons. We need to build in protections at the start of any such procedure, rather than allowing teachers to be shoved off YouTube.